Qt QXmlStreamReader Access Violation

我正在使用Qt 5.11.1(MSVSC2015 32位(和QtCreator 4.6.2。 我在使用 QXmlStreamReader 解析 XML 时遇到问题。代码是基于Qt的例子编写的。 当我的代码被执行时，它会在 QIODevice 中产生访问冲突.cpp在 checkWarnMessage 函数中。 此图显示了发生访问冲突的调用堆栈和确切行。

实际的 XML i 更复杂，并且具有嵌套元素。解析XML的函数的实现方式与Qt示例中的void XbelReader：：readXBEL((函数相同(基于元素名称调用适当的函数来解析该元素(。但是通过这个简单的例子，我设法重现了我在实际解决方案中遇到的问题。

XML 是：

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
<element1>1</element1>
<element2>2</element2>
<element3>3</element3>
<element4>4</element4>
<element5>5</element5>
<element6>6</element6>
</root>

解析此 XML 的代码是：

#include <string>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <iostream>
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QXmlStreamReader>
#include <QFile>
#include <QString>
#define ASSERT_ELEMENT_NAME(NAME) Q_ASSERT(xmlReader.isStartElement() && xmlReader.name() == NAME);
using namespace std;
void OpenFile(const QString& fileName, QXmlStreamReader& xmlReader)
{
QFile configFile(fileName);
if (configFile.open(QFile::ReadOnly | QFile::Text) == false)
throw runtime_error(string("Failed to open file: ") + configFile.errorString().toStdString());
xmlReader.setDevice(&configFile);
if (xmlReader.readNextStartElement() == false)
throw runtime_error("File does not have root element");
if (xmlReader.name() != "root")
throw runtime_error("File has invalid root element");
}
void ParseElement1(QXmlStreamReader& xmlReader)
{
ASSERT_ELEMENT_NAME("element1");
auto text = xmlReader.readElementText().trimmed();
auto isOk = false;
auto value = text.toInt(&isOk);
if (isOk == false)
throw runtime_error(string("invalid value: ") + text.toStdString());
else
cout << "element1: " << value << endl;
}
void ParseElement2(QXmlStreamReader& xmlReader)
{
ASSERT_ELEMENT_NAME("element2");
auto text = xmlReader.readElementText().trimmed();
auto isOk = false;
auto value = text.toInt(&isOk);
if (isOk == false)
throw runtime_error(string("invalid value: ") + text.toStdString());
else
cout << "element2: " << value << endl;
}
int main()
{
QXmlStreamReader xmlReader;
OpenFile("config.xml", xmlReader);
while(xmlReader.readNextStartElement())
{
if(xmlReader.name() == "element1")
ParseElement1(xmlReader);
if(xmlReader.name() == "element2")
ParseElement2(xmlReader);
else
xmlReader.skipCurrentElement();
}
}

如果我在主函数中评论两行：

if(xmlReader.name() == "element2")
ParseElement2(xmlReader);

不会发生访问冲突。

我真的不知道我做错了什么。还是QXmlStreamReader中存在错误？我认为即使我做错了什么，Qt的库中也不应该发生访问冲突。

整个项目(XmlParser.pro、主.cpp和配置.xml(可以从此链接下载

编辑

我已经按照 Manthan 的建议修复了我的示例，它按预期工作。我在 XML 中添加了另一件事。我在元素 1 之前添加了大的多行注释。注释本身有 8019 个字符，包括空格字符，而整个 XML 文件有 8266 个字符。

XML 现在看起来像

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
<!--
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, 
comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment, comment,
comment, comment, co
-->
<element1>1</element1>
<element2>2</element2>
<element3>3</element3>
<element4>4</element4>
<element5>5</element5>
<element6>6</element6>
</root>

我已经检查了XML在带有XML工具插件的Notepad ++中是否有效，并且在xmlvalidation.xml上也有效。当我使用新 XML 执行固定示例时，我再次在先前链接的图像上描绘的完全相同的位置上出现访问冲突。

现在，如果我从 XML 中的注释中删除最后一个"o"字符(或从注释中删除任何其他字符，或者从 element6 的文本中删除"6"，或者事实上在保持 XML 有效的同时从 XML 中删除任何字符(，示例成功执行。这是我最初的问题。我在原始XML文件中有很多注释，导致文件大于8KB。目前，作为一种解决方法，我删除评论以避免访问冲突。

我不清楚注释(或文件(长度如何导致访问冲突。

整个项目可以从此链接下载