boost和c++11线程兼容性

boost and c++11 thread compatibility

本文关键字:兼容性 线程 c++11 boost      更新时间:2023-10-16

有一个代码,用于在ubuntu下使用boost线程运行。它是基本的只读数据共享多线程。我尝试使用C++11而不是boost,非常基本的转换。代码可以编译,但有一些细微的错误。使用C++11标准线程随机崩溃。尝试使用valgrind drd,但很难读取调试信息。有什么想法吗?

==19608== Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x00643be8 size 8
==19608==    at 0x41CEBA: std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>::operator()() (random.tcc:601)
==19608==    by 0x41CD6C: double std::generate_canonical<double, 53ul, std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul> >(std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>&) (random.tcc:3475)
==19608==    by 0x41CB06: std::__detail::_Adaptor<std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>, double>::operator()() (random.h:190)
==19608==    by 0x41C877: double std::normal_distribution<double>::operator()<std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul> >(std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>&, std::normal_distribution<double>::param_type const&) (random.tcc:1950)
==19608==    by 0x41C688: double std::normal_distribution<double>::operator()<std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul> >(std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>&) (random.h:2196)
==19608==    by 0x41C379: nrand(double, double) (NRand.cpp:8)
==19608==    by 0x416F78: ClassDef::set_x() (LoanDef.h:407)
==19608==    by 0x4168CA: Sim(std::vector<ClassDef, std::allocator<ClassDef> >&, Assumption&, std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > >&, unsigned int, NextStepCalcML&, std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >&, unsigned int, unsigned int) (NewSim.cpp:105)
==19608==    by 0x411A09: _ZNSt12_Bind_simpleIFPFvRSt6vectorI7LoanDefSaIS1_EER10AssumptionRSt13unordered_mapISsS0_IdSaIdEESt4hashISsESt8equal_toISsESaISt4pairIKSsS9_EEEjR14NextStepCalcMLRS0_IS0_IS9_SaIS9_EESaISN_EEjjESt17reference_wrapperIS3_EST_IS5_EST_ISI_EjST_ISK_EST_ISP_EjjEE9_M_invokeIILm0ELm1ELm2ELm3ELm4ELm5ELm6ELm7EEEEvSt12_Index_tupleIIXspT_EEE (functional:1732)
==19608==    by 0x4116AE: std::_Bind_simple<void (*()(std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<LoanDef, std::allocator<LoanDef> > >, std::reference_wrapper<Assumption>, std::reference_wrapper<std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >, unsigned int, std::reference_wrapper<NextStepCalcML>, std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > > >, unsigned int, unsigned int))(std::vector<LoanDef, std::allocator<ClassDef> >&, Assumption&, std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > >&, unsigned int, NextStep&, std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >&, unsigned int, unsigned int)>::operator()() (functional:1720)
==19608==    by 0x411647: std::thread::_Impl<std::_Bind_simple<void (*()(std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<ClassDef, std::allocator<ClassDef> > >, std::reference_wrapper<Assumption>, std::reference_wrapper<std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >, unsigned int, std::reference_wrapper<NextStep>, std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > > >, unsigned int, unsigned int))(std::vector<LoanDef, std::allocator<LoanDef> >&, Assumption&, std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > >&, unsigned int, NextStep&, std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >&, unsigned int, unsigned int)> >::_M_run() (thread:115)

谢谢。顺便说一句,我试着使用我写的这个随机头文件,不确定它在多线程环境下是否安全。它过去和boost一起工作很好。

myrand.hpp

#ifndef NRAND_H
#define NRAND_H
#include <random>
double nrand(double mean = 0., double sd = 1.);
double urand(double a=0., double b=0.);
#endif

和myrand.cpp

#include "NRand.h"
using namespace std;
double nrand(double mean, double sd) {
    static random_device rd;
    static subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned,24,10,24> e(rd());
    normal_distribution<> dist(mean, sd);
    return dist(e);
}
double urand(double a, double b) {
    static random_device rd;
    static subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned,24,10,24> e(rd());
    uniform_real_distribution<> dist(a, b);
    return dist(e);
}

非常感谢。

IMHO,您的代码不是线程安全的,因此不应该在C++11下正确工作。我认为问题是static变量rde是全局变量,但不受(互斥)保护,因此并发调用将竞争。

据推测,您可以通过使这些变量thread_local使这些代码线程安全,但我没有经验。