使用GetProcAddress调用外部函数会导致应用程序崩溃
Calling an external function with GetProcAddress crashes the app
我一直试图用GetProcAddress函数调用一个外部函数,但每次调用该函数时,它都会崩溃控制台。我一直在寻找,但在每一篇文章中,我都得到了相同的最终解决方案,但当我在DLL中尝试时,它会崩溃应用程序。
这是代码:
#include <Windows.h>
#include <vector>
#include "SDKplugin.h"
typedef void (*logprintf_t)(char* format, ...);
logprintf_t logprintf;
// static void* m_AMXExports[44];
typedef bool (PLUGIN_CALL *ServerPluginLoad_t)(void **data);
typedef void (PLUGIN_CALL *ServerPluginUnload_t)();
typedef unsigned int (PLUGIN_CALL *ServerPluginSupports_t)();
typedef void (PLUGIN_CALL *ServerPluginProcessTick_t)();
typedef int (PLUGIN_CALL *ServerPluginAmxLoad_t)(AMX *amx);
typedef int (PLUGIN_CALL *ServerPluginAmxUnload_t)(AMX *amx);
struct Plugins
{
void* AppData[256];
SUPPORTS_FLAGS FlagSupport;
HMODULE Module;
ServerPluginLoad_t LOAD;
ServerPluginUnload_t UNLOAD;
ServerPluginSupports_t SUPPORTS;
ServerPluginProcessTick_t PROCESSTICK;
// AMX Plugin Interface
ServerPluginAmxLoad_t AMXLOAD;
ServerPluginAmxUnload_t AMXUNLOAD;
};
Plugins* ServerPlugins;
void **ppPluginData ;
extern void *pAMXFunctions;
//native LoadLibrary(libraryname[]);
static cell AMX_NATIVE_CALL my_LoadLibrary(AMX* amx, cell* params)
{
bool validfunc = false;
char *path;
amx_StrParam(amx, params[1], path);
logprintf("Loading plugin %s", path);
ServerPlugins = new Plugins();
ServerPlugins->Module = LoadLibraryA(path);
if (ServerPlugins->Module == NULL)
{
delete ServerPlugins;
logprintf("Failed loading plugin %s (Error: %d)", path, GetLastError());
return 0;
}
logprintf("NULL");
ServerPlugins->LOAD = (ServerPluginLoad_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "Load");
ServerPlugins->UNLOAD = (ServerPluginUnload_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "Unload");
ServerPlugins->SUPPORTS = (ServerPluginSupports_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "Supports");
if (ServerPlugins->LOAD == NULL || ServerPlugins->SUPPORTS == NULL || ServerPlugins->UNLOAD == NULL)
{
logprintf(" Plugin doesnt conform to architecture");
FreeLibrary(ServerPlugins->Module);
delete ServerPlugins;
return false;
}
logprintf("NULL 1");
ServerPlugins->FlagSupport = (SUPPORTS_FLAGS)ServerPlugins->SUPPORTS();
if ((ServerPlugins->FlagSupport & SUPPORTS_VERSION_MASK) > SUPPORTS_VERSION)
{
logprintf("Unsupported Version; unloading.");
FreeLibrary(ServerPlugins->Module);
delete ServerPlugins;
return false;
}
logprintf("NULL 2");
if ((ServerPlugins->FlagSupport & SUPPORTS_AMX_NATIVES) > SUPPORTS_VERSION)
{
ServerPlugins->AMXLOAD = (ServerPluginAmxLoad_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "AmxLoad");
ServerPlugins->AMXUNLOAD = (ServerPluginAmxUnload_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "AmxUnload");
}
else
{
ServerPlugins->AMXLOAD = NULL;
ServerPlugins->AMXUNLOAD = NULL;
logprintf("Any Abstract Machine has been loaded");
}
logprintf("NULL 3");
if ((ServerPlugins->FlagSupport & SUPPORTS_PROCESS_TICK) != 0)
{
ServerPlugins->PROCESSTICK = (ServerPluginProcessTick_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "ProcessTick");
}
else
{
ServerPlugins->PROCESSTICK = NULL;
}
logprintf("NULL 4"); //debugging
ServerPlugins->AppData[PLUGIN_DATA_AMX_EXPORTS] = pAMXFunctions;
ServerPlugins->AppData[PLUGIN_DATA_LOGPRINTF] = &logprintf;
if (!(ServerPlugins->LOAD)(ServerPlugins->AppData)) //i didnt put it as &ServerPlugins->AppData because it causes an error
{
logprintf("Initialized failed loading plugin %s", path);
FreeLibrary(ServerPlugins->Module);
logprintf("NULL 5");
delete ServerPlugins;
return false;
}
logprintf("Plugin %s loaded", path);
return true;
}
//native UnloadLibrary(libraryname[]);
static cell AMX_NATIVE_CALL my_UnloadLibrary(AMX*amx, cell*params)
{
char *path;
amx_StrParam(amx, params[1], path);
ServerPlugins->Module = GetModuleHandle((LPCTSTR)path);
if (ServerPlugins->Module != NULL)
{
ServerPlugins->UNLOAD = (ServerPluginUnload_t)GetProcAddress(ServerPlugins->Module, "Unload");
if (ServerPlugins->UNLOAD != NULL)
{
ServerPlugins->UNLOAD();
FreeLibrary(GetModuleHandleA(path));
logprintf("Library %s has been unloaded correctly", path);
return 1;
}
else
{
logprintf("Unloading library %s failed (Error: %d)", GetLastError());
return 0;
}
}
return 1;
}
PLUGIN_EXPORT bool PLUGIN_CALL Load(void **ppData)
{
pAMXFunctions = ppData[PLUGIN_DATA_AMX_EXPORTS];
logprintf = (logprintf_t)ppData[PLUGIN_DATA_LOGPRINTF];
return 1;
}
PLUGIN_EXPORT void PLUGIN_CALL Unload()
{
}
PLUGIN_EXPORT unsigned int PLUGIN_CALL Supports()
{
return SUPPORTS_VERSION | SUPPORTS_AMX_NATIVES;
}
AMX_NATIVE_INFO projectNatives[] =
{
{ "LoadLibrary", my_LoadLibrary },
{ "UnloadLibrary", my_UnloadLibrary }
};
PLUGIN_EXPORT int PLUGIN_CALL AmxLoad(AMX *amx)
{
return amx_Register(amx, projectNatives, -1);
}
PLUGIN_EXPORT int PLUGIN_CALL AmxUnload(AMX *amx)
{
return AMX_ERR_NONE;
}
convertCharArrayToLPCWSTR()
中存在内存泄漏。您永远不会释放您分配的wchar_t*
。不需要convertCharArrayToLPCWSTR()
函数本身,只需按原样将char*
路径传递给LoadLibraryA()
即可:
char *path;
amx_StrParam(amx, params[1], path);
...
ServerPlugins->Module = LoadLibraryA(path);
您没有检查GetProcAddress("Unload")
是否成功加载了ServerPlugins->UNLOAD
。
您正在将GetProcAddress("Load")
用于ServerPlugins->LOAD
和ServerPlugins->AMXLOAD
,将GetProcAddress("Unload")
用于ServerPlugins->UNLOAD
和ServerPlugins->AMXUNLOAD
。这对我来说很可疑。DLL真的对AMX和非AMX入口点使用相同的导出吗?如果是这样,那么考虑到ServerPluginLoad_t
与ServerPluginAmxLoad_t
具有非常不同的签名,并且ServerPlugin(Amx)Unload_t
也是如此,这是非常糟糕的设计。这是一个正在等待发生的损坏的调用堆栈。让DLL导出单独的AmxLoad()
和AmxUnload()
函数会更安全。
因此,SUPPORTS_AMX_NATIVES
和SUPPORTS_PROCESS_TICK
标志是多余的,因为GetProcAddress()
会告诉您这些导出是否可用。
至于调用ServerPlugins->LOAD
时的崩溃,在将数据传递给Load()
之前,我没有看到您用任何数据初始化ppData
。当然不是PLUGIN_DATA_AMX_EXPORTS
和PLUGIN_DATA_LOGPRINTF
时隙,至少:
ppData[PLUGIN_DATA_AMX_EXPORTS] = pAMXFunctions;
ppData[PLUGIN_DATA_LOGPRINTF] = &logprintf;
if (!(ServerPlugins->LOAD)(ppData))
因此,即使对Load()
的调用本身没有崩溃,DLL在稍后尝试使用其在Load()
中分配的本地pAMXFunctions
和logprintf
指针时仍可能崩溃。
既然如此,为什么要将这样的东西作为void*
数组而不是struct
来传递呢?那会更安全,例如:
struct PluginInitData
{
void* pAMXFunctions;
logprintf_t logprintf;
...
};
typedef bool (__stdcall *ServerPluginLoad_t)(PluginInitData* data);
PluginInitData pInitData;
pInitData.pAMXFunctions = pAMXFunctions;
pInitData.logprintf = &logprintf;
...
if (!(ServerPlugins->LOAD)(&pInitData))
extern "C" bool __stdcall Load(PluginInitData* data)
{
pAMXFunctions = data->pAMXFunctions;
logprintf = data->logprintf;
...
return true;
}
更新:您已经修复了我提到的大多数问题,但现在我发现您的my_UnloadLibrary()
函数实现错误根本不要调用GetModuleHandle()
或GetProcAddress()
,使用先前在my_LoadLibrary()
中初始化的现有Module
和UNLOAD
指针。
static cell AMX_NATIVE_CALL my_LoadLibrary(AMX* amx, cell* params)
{
char *path;
amx_StrParam(amx, params[1], path);
...
ServerPlugins->Path = path;
...
}
static cell AMX_NATIVE_CALL my_UnloadLibrary(AMX*amx, cell*params)
{
if (ServerPlugins)
{
if (ServerPlugins->UNLOAD != NULL)
ServerPlugins->UNLOAD();
if (ServerPlugins->Module != NULL)
{
FreeLibrary(ServerPlugins->Module);
ServerPlugins->Module = NULL;
}
logprintf("Library %s has been unloaded", ServerPlugins->Path);
delete ServerPlugins;
ServerPlugins = NULL;
}
return 1;
}
如果您仍然有Load()
崩溃的问题,那么您只需要使用编译器的调试器来了解运行时实际发生了什么。到目前为止显示的代码不应该崩溃,所以要么是调用约定不匹配,要么是数据对齐不匹配,或者是内存损坏,等等。我们无法为您运行调试器。
- 应用程序崩溃并显示"symbol _ZdlPvm, version Qt_5 not defined in file libQt5Core.so.5 with link time reference"
- 如何找出应用程序崩溃的原因 - Win 10 LTSB
- 操纵安卓相机的深度图导致应用程序崩溃
- 调用 java 的回调() 时应用程序崩溃.由于 detatchThread 而获得运行时错误
- QCompleter set模型使应用程序崩溃
- Qt 5 应用程序崩溃并出现"qLineEdit::setText"
- 切换NvAPI_Stereo_Deactivate/NvAPI_Stereo_activate会使unity应用程序崩溃
- eglSwapBuffers上的应用程序崩溃
- VLD 使应用程序崩溃
- 由于调用 std::condition_variable 后参数无效而导致应用程序崩溃
- 执行递归函数时 C++ 应用程序崩溃
- 在 C++/CLI/C# 项目中启用"Native Code Debugging"导致应用程序崩溃
- LOCAL_SHARED_LIBRARIES使我的应用程序崩溃
- 为什么使用 nullPtr 调用函数不会使我的应用程序崩溃
- 当删除上下文属性中的QLIST对象时,QT QML应用程序崩溃
- React 本机 0.59 应用程序崩溃并出现 libc 错误
- 当使用“制造”编译的程序中使用库时,应用程序崩溃
- 如何在导致应用程序崩溃的代码中修复指令
- C++多线程应用程序崩溃
- 当使用 /ENTRY:main 和 /MT 运行时库编译为 /SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS 时,应用程序崩溃