区分不明确的成员请求错误和 SFINAE 上下文中成员不存在的错误

Differentiate between ambiguous member request error and member does not exist error in SFINAE context?

本文关键字:错误 成员 不存在 上下文 SFINAE 请求 不明确      更新时间:2023-10-16

编辑:发布了我自己的答案,保留了原始接受的答案...让我想到了别名。

编辑:我的问题针对的是区分歧义与在SFINAE(或其他(上下文中成员var/func的存在的可能性。 我的问题不是关于如何制作has_member模板,而是关于检测歧义与存在之间的差异

是否可以设置部分专用化,以区分何时以不明确的方式访问成员(派生类的两个基基都有成员(与成员是否存在(派生类的两个基都没有成员(? 当检测到歧义时,我才需要返回 true,但如果根本没有成员,或者它只存在于一个类中,则不需要返回 true。 这就是我到目前为止所拥有的,它为歧义(我想要的(返回 true,对于只有一个具有成员的类(也是我想要的(返回 false,但如果两个类都没有成员,则返回 true(啊!

//for the sake of this example, ClassOne comes from a lib I don't control
struct ClassOne {
    //some unknown members in here... 
};
struct ClassTwo {
    string member_var;
};
template<typename A>
struct helper : std::true_type {};
template<typename A, typename B>
struct merged_class : public A, public B {};
template<typename T, typename = void>
struct has_member_var : std::true_type {
    //Member request ambiguous or neither class has member.
    //I want to catch these conditions separately,
    //but this one template catches both :(
    const int status = 1;
};
template<typename T>
struct has_member_var<
    T
    , typename std::enable_if<
        //The next line results in either ambiguous member request error
        //if both classes have the member OR
        //member does not exist error if neither class has the member
        //...how to tell the difference in the type of error?
        helper<decltype(T::member_var)>::value
        , T
    >::type
> : std::false_type {
    const int status = 2; //only one class has member 
};
//This next one I have no idea how to do, if it's even possible.
//I'd like a third specialization that will match either the
//ambiguous condition or the member only existing in one of the
//base classes.
template<typename T>
struct has_member<
    T
    , typename std::enable_if<
        some_freaky_magic<decltype(T::foo)>::true_value
        , T
    >::type
> : std::true_type {
    const int status = 3;
};

期望用法:

switch(has_member<merged_class<ClassOne, ClassTwo>>::status) {
    case 1:
        cout << "member ambiguity";
        break;
    case 2:
        cout << "member non-existence";
        break;
    case 3:
        cout << "member existence for only one base";
        break;
}

好吧,我想我设法采用了表达式 SFINAE 方法并添加了类型推导。这是一个非常粗略的答案,似乎正在做一些有用的事情(请参阅底部的使用示例(。

(演示文稿可能会更加简洁和干净,但通过这种方式,您可以看到它分解为步骤。

用法:当且仅当AB都有一个名为 x 的成员并且该成员的类型不同(严格来说,不衰减(时,conflicting_X<A, B>::value为真。中间问题(例如是否为两个类都定义了成员(可以通过 conflicting_X<A, B>::bothhas_X<T>::value 来决定。

#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
#include <typeinfo>

// has_X is taken straight from the other topic
template <typename T>
struct has_X
{
  struct Fallback { int x; }; // introduce member name "x"
  struct Derived : T, Fallback { };
  template<typename C, C> struct ChT;
  template<typename C> static char (&f(ChT<int Fallback::*, &C::x>*))[1];
  template<typename C> static char (&f(...))[2];
  static bool const value = sizeof(f<Derived>(0)) == 2;
};
// Here we go...
template <typename T>
struct XType
{
  typedef decltype(T::x) type;
};
template <bool, typename S, typename T>
struct compare_X
{
  static const bool value = false;
};
template <typename S, typename T>
struct compare_X<true, S, T>
{
  // Note that we don't decay, we want equality on the nose.
  static const bool value =  ! std::is_same<typename XType<S>::type, typename XType<T>::type>::value;
};
template <typename S, typename T>
struct conflicting_X
{
  // We split this up so that XType is only instantiated if T::x really exists.
  // You may also use conflicting_X::both as a useful datum.
  static const bool both = has_X<S>::value && has_X<T>::value;
  static const bool value = compare_X<both, S, T>::value;
};

/*** Example ***/
struct A { int x; };
struct B { int X; };
struct C { double x; };
void f(double) { }
int main() {
  std::cout << has_X<A>::value << std::endl; // 1
  std::cout << has_X<B>::value << std::endl; // 0
  std::cout << "Conflict A/B? " << conflicting_X<A, B>::value << std::endl;
  std::cout << "Conflict A/C? " << conflicting_X<A, C>::value << std::endl;
}

更新:我最近对我在原始答案中发布的代码做了更多的事情,所以我正在更新它以考虑更改/添加。

以下是一些使用代码段:*这一切的胆量更远

检查给定类中的成员x。 可以是 var、func、class、union 或 enum:

CREATE_MEMBER_CHECK(x);
bool has_x = has_member_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

检查成员函数void x()

//Func signature MUST have T as template variable here... simpler this way :
CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_SIG_CHECK(x, void (T::*)(), void__x);
bool has_func_sig_void__x = has_member_func_void__x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

检查成员变量x

CREATE_MEMBER_VAR_CHECK(x);
bool has_var_x = has_member_var_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

检查成员类x

CREATE_MEMBER_CLASS_CHECK(x);
bool has_class_x = has_member_class_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

检查会员工会x

CREATE_MEMBER_UNION_CHECK(x);
bool has_union_x = has_member_union_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

检查成员枚举x

CREATE_MEMBER_ENUM_CHECK(x);
bool has_enum_x = has_member_enum_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

检查是否有任何成员函数x而不考虑签名:

CREATE_MEMBER_CHECK(x);
CREATE_MEMBER_VAR_CHECK(x);
CREATE_MEMBER_CLASS_CHECK(x);
CREATE_MEMBER_UNION_CHECK(x);
CREATE_MEMBER_ENUM_CHECK(x);
CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_CHECK(x);
bool has_any_func_x = has_member_func_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

CREATE_MEMBER_CHECKS(x);  //Just stamps out the same macro calls as above.
bool has_any_func_x = has_member_func_x<class_to_check_for_x>::value;

细节和核心:

/*
    - Multiple inheritance forces ambiguity of member names.
    - SFINAE is used to make aliases to member names.
    - Expression SFINAE is used in just one generic has_member that can accept
      any alias we pass it.
*/
template <typename... Args> struct ambiguate : public Args... {};
template<typename A, typename = void>
struct got_type : std::false_type {};
template<typename A>
struct got_type<A> : std::true_type {
    typedef A type;
};
template<typename T, T>
struct sig_check : std::true_type {};
template<typename Alias, typename AmbiguitySeed>
struct has_member {
    template<typename C> static char ((&f(decltype(&C::value))))[1];
    template<typename C> static char ((&f(...)))[2];
    //Make sure the member name is consistently spelled the same.
    static_assert(
        (sizeof(f<AmbiguitySeed>(0)) == 1)
        , "Member name specified in AmbiguitySeed is different from member name specified in Alias, or wrong Alias/AmbiguitySeed has been specified."
    );
    static bool const value = sizeof(f<Alias>(0)) == 2;
};

宏(暗黑破坏神!

CREATE_MEMBER_CHECK:

//Check for any member with given name, whether var, func, class, union, enum.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_CHECK(member)                                         
                                                                            
template<typename T, typename = std::true_type>                             
struct Alias_##member;                                                      
                                                                            
template<typename T>                                                        
struct Alias_##member <                                                     
    T, std::integral_constant<bool, got_type<decltype(&T::member)>::value>  
> { static const decltype(&T::member) value; };                             
                                                                            
struct AmbiguitySeed_##member { char member; };                             
                                                                            
template<typename T>                                                        
struct has_member_##member {                                                
    static const bool value                                                 
        = has_member<                                                       
            Alias_##member<ambiguate<T, AmbiguitySeed_##member>>            
            , Alias_##member<AmbiguitySeed_##member>                        
        >::value                                                            
    ;                                                                       
}

CREATE_MEMBER_VAR_CHECK:

//Check for member variable with given name.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_VAR_CHECK(var_name)                                   
                                                                            
template<typename T, typename = std::true_type>                             
struct has_member_var_##var_name : std::false_type {};                      
                                                                            
template<typename T>                                                        
struct has_member_var_##var_name<                                           
    T                                                                       
    , std::integral_constant<                                               
        bool                                                                
        , !std::is_member_function_pointer<decltype(&T::var_name)>::value   
    >                                                                       
> : std::true_type {}

CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_SIG_CHECK:

//Check for member function with given name AND signature.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_SIG_CHECK(func_name, func_sig, templ_postfix)    
                                                                            
template<typename T, typename = std::true_type>                             
struct has_member_func_##templ_postfix : std::false_type {};                
                                                                            
template<typename T>                                                        
struct has_member_func_##templ_postfix<                                     
    T, std::integral_constant<                                              
        bool                                                                
        , sig_check<func_sig, &T::func_name>::value                         
    >                                                                       
> : std::true_type {}

CREATE_MEMBER_CLASS_CHECK:

//Check for member class with given name.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_CLASS_CHECK(class_name)               
                                                            
template<typename T, typename = std::true_type>             
struct has_member_class_##class_name : std::false_type {};  
                                                            
template<typename T>                                        
struct has_member_class_##class_name<                       
    T                                                       
    , std::integral_constant<                               
        bool                                                
        , std::is_class<                                    
            typename got_type<typename T::class_name>::type 
        >::value                                            
    >                                                       
> : std::true_type {}

CREATE_MEMBER_UNION_CHECK:

//Check for member union with given name.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_UNION_CHECK(union_name)               
                                                            
template<typename T, typename = std::true_type>             
struct has_member_union_##union_name : std::false_type {};  
                                                            
template<typename T>                                        
struct has_member_union_##union_name<                       
    T                                                       
    , std::integral_constant<                               
        bool                                                
        , std::is_union<                                    
            typename got_type<typename T::union_name>::type 
        >::value                                            
    >                                                       
> : std::true_type {}

CREATE_MEMBER_ENUM_CHECK:

//Check for member enum with given name.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_ENUM_CHECK(enum_name)                 
                                                            
template<typename T, typename = std::true_type>             
struct has_member_enum_##enum_name : std::false_type {};    
                                                            
template<typename T>                                        
struct has_member_enum_##enum_name<                         
    T                                                       
    , std::integral_constant<                               
        bool                                                
        , std::is_enum<                                     
            typename got_type<typename T::enum_name>::type  
        >::value                                            
    >                                                       
> : std::true_type {}

CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_CHECK:

//Check for function with given name, any signature.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_CHECK(func)          
template<typename T>                            
struct has_member_func_##func {                 
    static const bool value                     
        = has_member_##func<T>::value           
        && !has_member_var_##func<T>::value     
        && !has_member_class_##func<T>::value   
        && !has_member_union_##func<T>::value   
        && !has_member_enum_##func<T>::value    
    ;                                           
}

CREATE_MEMBER_CHECKS:

//Create all the checks for one member.  Does NOT include func sig checks.
#define CREATE_MEMBER_CHECKS(member)    
CREATE_MEMBER_CHECK(member);            
CREATE_MEMBER_VAR_CHECK(member);        
CREATE_MEMBER_CLASS_CHECK(member);      
CREATE_MEMBER_UNION_CHECK(member);      
CREATE_MEMBER_ENUM_CHECK(member);       
CREATE_MEMBER_FUNC_CHECK(member)

我认为这是不可能的。要使 SFINAE 在此处工作,仅当您要查找的成员不明确时,才需要一个或多个处于特定有效/格式错误的组合中的表达式。这是假设扩展的SFINAE为C++0x。

但是,给定类型 T 和潜在的(非类型(成员i,有哪些表达式可用? &T::i,如果将案例限制为仅数据成员,则t.i t的类型为 T 的位置。

对于这两个表达式,如果i不明确,则每个表达式的格式不正确,但如果它存在且不模棱两可,则每个表达式的格式都很好。因此,我们无法满足您的要求。

请注意,给定具有明确数据成员i的潜在基B,您可以使用 &T::it.B::i 进行测试。如果第一个表达式格式不正确,而第二个表达式格式正确,则意味着存在不明确的成员i。这是我能达到的最接近你的要求。