生成的运算符的签名=()?
Signature of Generated operator=()?
我有以下代码:
#include <string>
#include <vector>
struct S {
const std::string str;
};
int main() {
std::vector<S> v;
const std::string test("test");
S s;
v.push_back(s);
}
它使用 g++ 4.8.5 编译得很好:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
但是当我尝试使用 g++ 4.6.2 编译它时,我遇到了以下错误:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/vector:70:0,
from compilerTest.cpp:2:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc: In member function ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {const S&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<S*, std::vector<S> >, typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer = S*]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_vector.h:834:4: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const value_type&) [with _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::value_type = S]’
compilerTest.cpp:12:14: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:319:4: error: use of deleted function ‘S& S::operator=(const S&)’
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: error: ‘S& S::operator=(const S&)’ is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: error: passing ‘const string {aka const std::basic_string<char>}’ as ‘this’ argument of ‘std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>&) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>, _Alloc = std::allocator<char>, std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> = std::basic_string<char>]’ discards qualifiers [-fpermissive]
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/char_traits.h:41:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/string:42,
from compilerTest.cpp:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h: In static member function ‘static _BI2 std::__copy_move_backward<true, false, std::random_access_iterator_tag>::__copy_move_b(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:581:18: instantiated from ‘_BI2 std::__copy_move_backward_a(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with bool _IsMove = true, _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:590:34: instantiated from ‘_BI2 std::__copy_move_backward_a2(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with bool _IsMove = true, _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:661:15: instantiated from ‘_BI2 std::move_backward(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:313:4: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {const S&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<S*, std::vector<S> >, typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_vector.h:834:4: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const value_type&) [with _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::value_type = S]’
compilerTest.cpp:12:14: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:546:6: error: use of deleted function ‘S& S::operator=(const S&)’
为什么S& S::operator=(const S&)
被"删除"?
我正在使用命令进行编译:
g++ -Wall compilerTest.cpp -o compilerTest -std=c++0x
即使我使用 emplace_back(),它也给了我类似的错误:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/c++allocator.h:34:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/allocator.h:48,
from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/string:43,
from compilerTest.cpp:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/ext/new_allocator.h: In member function ‘void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::construct(__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::pointer, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {std::basic_string<char>&}, _Tp = S, __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::pointer = S*]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:97:6: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::emplace_back(_Args&& ...) [with _Args = {std::basic_string<char>&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>]’
compilerTest.cpp:11:18: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/ext/new_allocator.h:114:4: error: no matching function for call to ‘S::S(std::basic_string<char>&)’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/ext/new_allocator.h:114:4: note: candidates are:
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: S::S()
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: S::S(const S&)
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::basic_string<char>’ to ‘const S&’
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/vector:70:0,
from compilerTest.cpp:2:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc: In member function ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {std::basic_string<char>&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<S*, std::vector<S> >, typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer = S*]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:102:4: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::emplace_back(_Args&& ...) [with _Args = {std::basic_string<char>&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>]’
compilerTest.cpp:11:18: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:319:4: error: no matching function for call to ‘S::S(std::basic_string<char>&)’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:319:4: note: candidates are:
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: S::S()
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: S::S(const S&)
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::basic_string<char>’ to ‘const S&’
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/char_traits.h:41:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/string:42,
from compilerTest.cpp:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h: In static member function ‘static _BI2 std::__copy_move_backward<true, false, std::random_access_iterator_tag>::__copy_move_b(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:581:18: instantiated from ‘_BI2 std::__copy_move_backward_a(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with bool _IsMove = true, _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:590:34: instantiated from ‘_BI2 std::__copy_move_backward_a2(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with bool _IsMove = true, _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:661:15: instantiated from ‘_BI2 std::move_backward(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2) [with _BI1 = S*, _BI2 = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:313:4: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {std::basic_string<char>&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<S*, std::vector<S> >, typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer = S*]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/vector.tcc:102:4: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::emplace_back(_Args&& ...) [with _Args = {std::basic_string<char>&}, _Tp = S, _Alloc = std::allocator<S>]’
compilerTest.cpp:11:18: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:546:6: error: use of deleted function ‘S& S::operator=(const S&)’
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: error: ‘S& S::operator=(const S&)’ is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
compilerTest.cpp:4:8: error: passing ‘const string {aka const std::basic_string<char>}’ as ‘this’ argument of ‘std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>&) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>, _Alloc = std::allocator<char>, std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> = std::basic_string<char>]’ discards qualifiers [-fpermissive]
:operator=(const S&)被"删除"?
因为S
有一个const
成员str
这使得默认的复制赋值运算符被定义为已删除。
如果满足以下任一条件,则类
T
的缺省复制赋值运算符定义为已删除:
T
具有无法复制分配的非静态数据成员或直接或虚拟基类(复制分配的重载解析失败,或者选择已删除或无法访问的函数);
不可能在const string
上调用operator=
,它是一个非常量成员函数。
而std::vector
的类型要求从C++11开始变化:
T
必须满足 CopyAssignable 和 CopyConstructable 的要求。 (至C++11)对元素施加的要求取决于实际 对容器执行的操作。通常,要求 元素类型是完整的类型,符合 可擦除,但许多成员函数提出了更严格的要求。 (自C++11起)
因此,从 C++11 开始,要求取决于您执行的操作。事实上,std::vector::push_back
不需要类型T
是可复制的,复制可插入就可以了。
类型要求
- T 必须满足 CopyInsertable 的要求才能使用重载 (1)。
这就是为什么它使用 gcc4.8.5 编译,但 gcc4.6.2 抱怨复制赋值运算符被删除。(支持AFAIK gcc C++4.8.1的11)
当您具有非静态 const 成员时,将隐式删除复制赋值
这是因为您复制到的对象没有重新初始化,因此您有一个无法重新分配到的现有 const。
在您的情况下,不完全支持 C++11,这要求向量成员具有复制赋值
- 为什么比较运算符如此快速
- C++映射:具有自定义类的运算符[]不起作用(总是返回0)
- 使用C++中的模板和运算符重载执行矩阵运算
- 为什么这个运算符<重载函数对 STL 算法不可见?
- 增量运算符与后缀混淆
- 一个关于在C++中重载布尔运算符的问题
- 运算符C++ "delete []"仅删除 2 个前值
- 模板类无法识别友元运算符
- 我可以使用条件运算符初始化C风格的字符串文字吗
- 关闭||运算符优化
- 通过继承类使用来自不同命名空间的运算符
- C++Cast运算符过载
- 如何使用AngelScript注册SFML Vector2运算符
- 重载元组索引运算符-C++
- 如何使用重载的相等(==)运算符向测试用例添加描述
- 为什么Mat类的两个对象可以在不重载运算符+的情况下添加
- 多个If语句与使用逻辑运算符计算条件的单个语句的比较
- 布尔比较运算符是如何在C++中工作的
- 重载运算符new[]的行为取决于析构函数
- 如何防止clang格式在流运算符调用之间添加换行符<<