pthread_cond_wait/信号和互斥锁无法按预期工作
pthread_cond_wait/signal and mutex not working as expected
我正在尝试学习 pthread/mutex,但尽管在网上进行了大量研究/阅读,但我仍然无法理解这段代码出了什么问题:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <unistd.h>
struct data
{
int Counter = 0;
int calls = -1;
int iteration = -1;
pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
pthread_cond_t condition = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
};
void* threadAlarm (void* arg);
void* threadCounter (void* arg);
int main (void)
{
pthread_t monThreadCounter;
pthread_t monThreadAlarm;
struct data mydata;
if (pthread_create (&monThreadAlarm, NULL, threadAlarm,(void*)&mydata)>0)
printf("Pthread Alarme errorn");
if (pthread_create (&monThreadCounter, NULL, threadCounter, (void*)&mydata)>0)
printf("Pthread Counter errorn");
pthread_join (monThreadCounter, NULL);
pthread_join (monThreadAlarm, NULL);
return 0;
}
void* threadCounter (void *arg)
{
struct data *myarg = (struct data *)arg;
srand(time(NULL));
pthread_mutex_lock (&myarg->mutex);
while(1)
{
myarg->Counter += rand()%10; /* We add a random number to the counter */
if(myarg->Counter > 20) /* If Counter is greater than 20, we should trigger the alarm*/
{
myarg->iteration += 1; /* Iteration counter, to check any shift between expected triggers and reality */
printf("Counter = %i(%i)-->",myarg->Counter,myarg->iteration);
pthread_mutex_unlock (&myarg->mutex); /* Unlock mutex before sending signal */
if (pthread_cond_signal (&myarg->condition) >0)
{
printf("COND SIGNAL ERRORn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
usleep(10000); /* The shorter the sleep is, the weirder the output is */
pthread_mutex_lock (&myarg->mutex); /* We should get the lock again before testing/modifying any shared variable */
}
}
}
void* threadAlarm (void* arg)
{
struct data *myarg = (struct data *)arg;
while(1)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&myarg->mutex);
//while(myarg->Counter<21) // Uneeded? Since we'll never get the lock before the Counter thread detects condition and release it
{
printf("nWAITING for trigger...n",myarg->Counter);
if (pthread_cond_wait (&myarg->condition, &myarg->mutex)>0)
{
printf("ERROR COND WAITn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
}
myarg->calls+=1; // Calls counter, should be equal to iteration counter, overwise calls have been missed
printf("ALARM TRIGGERED! Call #%i/Iteration #%i -> COUNTER RESETn",myarg->calls, myarg->iteration);
// Counter reset
myarg->Counter = 0;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&myarg->mutex);
}
}
此代码应该有一个线程将计数器递增一个随机值,直到它大于 20,这将触发另一个等待线程的条件,该线程应显示消息并重置计数器。等等。
我不明白的是,尽管我认为我正在使用互斥锁和pthread_cond_wait和pthread_cond_signal,如网络上的各种示例中所述,但如果我不引入 usleep 来减慢它的速度,它的行为就不会按预期进行。
有了usleep(10000)
,我得到了预期的输出:
WAITING for trigger...
Counter = 23(59)-->ALARM TRIGGERED! Call #59/Iteration #59 -> COUNTER RESET
WAITING for trigger...
Counter = 23(60)-->ALARM TRIGGERED! Call #60/Iteration #60 -> COUNTER RESET
WAITING for trigger...
Counter = 21(61)-->ALARM TRIGGERED! Call #61/Iteration #61 -> COUNTER RESET
调用/迭代计数器是同步的,证明每次达到条件时,都会正确触发"警报"线程。
但是,如果我减少睡眠,结果就会变得奇怪。完全没有睡眠(注释掉),例如:
WAITING for trigger...
Counter = 21(57916)-->Counter = 23(57917)-->Counter = 29(57918)-->Counter = 38(57919)-->Counter = 45(57920)-->Counter = 45(57921)-->Counter = 45(57922)-->Counter = 49(57923)-->Counter = 52(57924)-->Counter = 55(57925)-->Counter = 61(57926)-->Counter = 65(57927)-->Counter = 70(57928)-->Counter = 77(57929)-->Counter = 83(57930)-->Counter = 86(57931)-->Counter = 92(57932)-->Counter = 95(57933)-->Counter = 99(57934)-->Counter = 107(57935)-->ALARM TRIGGERED! Call #4665/Iteration #57935 -> COUNTER RESET
WAITING for trigger...
Counter = 24(57936)-->Counter = 28(57937)-->Counter = 31(57938)-->Counter = 31(57939)-->Counter = 36(57940)-->Counter = 41(57941)-->Counter = 45(57942)-->Counter = 47(57943)-->Counter = 54(57944)-->Counter = 54(57945)-->Counter = 56(57946)-->Counter = 62(57947)-->Counter = 64(57948)-->Counter = 66(57949)-->Counter = 66
。
尽管计数器已达到触发状态,但它似乎没有触发警报线程并继续增加,并且调用/迭代计数器完全不同步,证明已错过大量调用。
如何确保每次发出pthread_cond_signal时,等待线程都会真正触发,并且调用线程会等到触发线程释放互斥锁?
如果这很重要,我目前正在Linux Ubuntu上编码。
感谢您的帮助。
预期行为。 发出条件变量信号后,等待线程最终将唤醒并争用互斥锁,但不能保证信号线程无法在此发生之前重新获取互斥锁。
如果您希望计数器线程等待警报被消耗,则需要实际编程以执行此操作。 您可以反过来使用相同的条件变量 - 在计数器线程中:
if (pthread_cond_signal (&myarg->condition) >0)
{
printf("COND SIGNAL ERRORn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
pthread_mutex_lock (&myarg->mutex); /* We should get the lock again before testing/modifying any shared variable */
/* Wait for alarm to happen */
while (myarg->calls < myarg->iteration)
{
pthread_cond_wait(&myarg->condition, &myarg->mutex);
}
在警报线程中,在递增myarg->calls
后的某个时间点调用pthread_cond_signal(&myarg->condition)
。
顺便说一下,您确实需要您在警报线程中注释掉的while(myarg->Counter<21)
。 请考虑以下两种情况:
警报线程在其主循环开始时的
pthread_mutex_lock()
处被阻塞。 计数器线程具有互斥锁,并且刚刚myarg->Counter
递增到大于 20 的值。 它会解锁互斥锁并向条件变量发出信号,然后警报线程有机会运行。 然后,警报线程运行,获取互斥锁并阻塞pthread_cond_wait()
- 它将永远在这里等待,因为我们现在已经确保计数器线程将等待警报被使用后再继续。报警线程刚刚将计数器递减为零,解锁互斥锁,立即将其重新锁定在循环顶部并调用
pthread_cond_wait()
。pthread_cond_wait()
在计数器线程有机会获取互斥锁之前立即返回(由于允许的"虚假唤醒"),并且即使计数器仍为零,警报线程现在也会继续。
这是工作版本,以防它对其他人有用:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <unistd.h>
struct data
{
int Counter = 0;
int calls = -1;
int iteration = -1;
pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
pthread_cond_t condition = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
};
void* threadAlarm (void* arg);
void* threadCounter (void* arg);
int main (void)
{
pthread_t monThreadCounter;
pthread_t monThreadAlarm;
struct data mydata;
if (pthread_create (&monThreadAlarm, NULL, threadAlarm, (void*)&mydata)>0)
printf("Pthread Alarme errorn");
if (pthread_create (&monThreadCounter, NULL, threadCounter, (void*)&mydata)>0)
printf("Pthread Counter errorn");
pthread_join (monThreadCounter, NULL);
pthread_join (monThreadAlarm, NULL);
return 0;
}
void* threadCounter (void *arg)
{
struct data *myarg = (struct data *)arg;
srand(time(NULL));
if (pthread_mutex_lock(&myarg->mutex) > 0)
{
printf("ERROR Mutex lock1 Countern");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
while(1)
{
myarg->Counter += rand()%10; /* We add a random number to the counter */
if(myarg->Counter > 20) /* If Counter is greater than 20, we should trigger the alarm*/
{
myarg->iteration += 1; /* Iteration counter, to check any shift between expected triggers and reality */
printf("Counter = %i(%i)-->",myarg->Counter,myarg->iteration);
if (pthread_mutex_unlock(&myarg->mutex) > 0) /* Unlock mutex before sending signal */
{
printf("ERROR Mutex Unlock Countern");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
if (pthread_cond_signal (&myarg->condition) >0)
{
printf("COND SIGNAL ERRORn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
if (pthread_mutex_lock(&myarg->mutex) > 0) /* We should get the lock again before testing/modifying any shared variable */
{
printf("ERROR Mutex lock2 Countern");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
/* Wait for alarm to happen */
while (myarg->calls < myarg->iteration)
{
pthread_cond_wait(&myarg->condition, &myarg->mutex);
}
}
}
}
void* threadAlarm (void* arg)
{
struct data *myarg = (struct data *)arg;
while(1)
{
if (pthread_mutex_lock(&myarg->mutex) > 0)
{
printf("ERROR Mutex lock Alarmn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
while(myarg->Counter<21)
{
printf("nWAITING for trigger...n");
if (pthread_cond_wait (&myarg->condition, &myarg->mutex)>0)
{
printf("ERROR COND WAITn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
}
myarg->calls+=1; // Calls counter, should be equal to iteration counter, overwise calls have been missed
printf("ALARM TRIGGERED! Call #%i/Iteration #%i -> COUNTER RESETn",myarg->calls, myarg->iteration);
// Counter reset
myarg->Counter = 0;
if (pthread_mutex_unlock(&myarg->mutex) > 0)
{
printf("ERROR Mutex Unlock Alarmn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
if (pthread_cond_signal (&myarg->condition) >0) //Signal back to Counter thread
{
printf("COND SIGNAL ERRORn");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
}
}
- QSqlquery prepare()和bindvalue()不工作
- std::condition_variable::wait()如何评估给定的谓词
- 导入库可以跨dll版本工作吗
- 以螺旋方式打印矩阵的程序.(工作不好)
- 对象指针在c++中是如何工作的
- 为什么在Windows上的VS 2019和Clang 9中"size_t"在没有标题的情况下工作
- VSOMEIP-2个设备之间的通信(TCP/UDP)不工作
- std::atomic和std::condition_variable wait,notify_*方法之间的区别
- 为字符串中每 N 个字符插入空格的函数没有按照我认为的方式工作?
- C++为线程工作动态地分割例程
- 为什么我的 std::ref 无法按预期工作?
- 布尔比较运算符是如何在C++中工作的
- std::memory_order for std::atomic:<T>:wait
- SampleConsensusPrerejective(ext.RANSAC)是如何真正工作的
- 不确定要在我的main中放入什么才能使我的代码正常工作
- 为什么std::condition_variable notify_all的工作速度比notify_one快(对于随机请
- <<操作员在下面的行中工作
- 有人能解释一下为什么下界是这样工作的吗C++的
- ExtractIconEx:可以工作,但偶尔会崩溃
- C++中的memset函数工作不正常