C ++继承:与从派生对象访问基本成员混淆

c++ inheritance : confused with base member access from derived object

本文关键字:访问 成员 对象 派生 继承      更新时间:2023-10-16

声明:

class base{
public:
    base(){a=0;}
    base(int a);
    int getA();
    virtual ~base() ;
protected:
    int a ;
};
//
class derived : public base {
public:
    derived(){}
    derived(int a, int b) ;
    int getC() ;
    ~derived();
private:
    int c ;
};

定义:

base::base(int a){
    cout << "   in base constructor a = " << a << endl ;
    a = a ;
}
base::~base(){
    a = 0 ;
}
int base::getA(){
    return a ;
}
//
derived::derived(int a, int b)
:base(a)
{
    c = a+b ;
}
int derived::getC()
{
    return c ;
}
derived::~derived(){
    c = 0 ;
}

叫:

derived A(4,5) ;
cout << "   a of A = " << A.getA() << "n" ;
cout << "   c of A = " << A.getC() << "n" ;

结果:

in base constructor a = 4
a of A = 4205648
c of A = 9

请有人解释为什么我得到这个结果而不是:

a of A = 4 

?为什么基本成员的值会发生变化?根据我在 c++ 中学到的继承知识,当我们创建派生类的对象时,该对象将继承基类的所有成员和成员函数,为什么派生类的对象A的成员 a 在派生类定义之外丢失了其值?

谢谢!

base::base(int a){
    cout << "   in base constructor a = " << a << endl ;
    a = a ;
}

此行更改构造函数参数的值 a ,而不是 basea 的值。更好的将是

base::base(int _a){
    cout << "   in base constructor a = " << _a << endl ;
    a = _a ;
}

更好的是使用构造函数初始化列表:

base::base(int _a): a(_a) {
    cout << "   in base constructor a = " << a << endl ;
}

在后一种情况下,您甚至可以写

base::base(int a): a(a) {
    cout << "   in base constructor a = " << a << endl ;
}

因为在初始化列表中没有歧义,尽管我仍然更喜欢显式并为构造函数参数和类成员使用不同的名称。