将抽象类的方法作为std::function传递

Passing the method of an abstract class as std::function

本文关键字:std function 传递 抽象类 方法      更新时间:2023-10-16

我有一些类似的代码(这只是一个片段,不是完全有效的代码(:

class AbstractClass {
public:
    AbstractClass() {}
    virtual ~AbstractClass() {}
    virtual void doA() { std::cout << "doA1n"; };
    virtual void doB() = 0;
};
class ImplClass : public AbstractClass {
public:
    ImplClass() {}
    virtual ~ImplClass() {}
    virtual void doA() override { std::cout << "doA2n"; };
    virtual void doB() override { std::cout << "doB2n"; };
};

现在,我想将对AbstractClass的成员方法的调用存储在一个std::函数中,如下所示:

int main() {
    AbstractClass* aClass = new ImplClass();
    std::function<void()> func = std::bind(&AbstractClass::doA, *aClass)
    delete aClass;
    return 0;
}

然而,根据编译器的说法,这是不起作用的,因为AbstractClass中存在纯虚拟方法。

编辑:完整错误供参考

In file included from source_file.cpp:2:0:
/usr/include/c++/5/functional: In instantiation of ‘struct std::_Bind_helper<false, void (AbstractClass::*)(), AbstractClass&>’:
/usr/include/c++/5/functional:1462:5:   required by substitution of ‘template<class _Func, class ... _BoundArgs> typename std::_Bind_helper<std::__is_socketlike<_Func>::value, _Func, _BoundArgs ...>::type std::bind(_Func&&, _BoundArgs&& ...) [with _Func = void (AbstractClass::*)(); _BoundArgs = {AbstractClass&}]’
source_file.cpp:26:72:   required from here
/usr/include/c++/5/functional:1445:71: error: invalid abstract parameter type ‘AbstractClass’
       typedef _Bind<__func_type(typename decay<_BoundArgs>::type...)> type;
                                                                       ^
source_file.cpp:5:7: note:   because the following virtual functions are pure within ‘AbstractClass’:
 class AbstractClass {
       ^
source_file.cpp:10:18: note:    virtual void AbstractClass::doB()
     virtual void doB() = 0;
                  ^
source_file.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
source_file.cpp:26:72: error: no matching function for call to ‘bind(void (AbstractClass::*)(), AbstractClass&)’
     std::function<void()> func = std::bind(&AbstractClass::doA, *aClass)
                                                                        ^
In file included from source_file.cpp:2:0:
/usr/include/c++/5/functional:1462:5: note: candidate: template<class _Func, class ... _BoundArgs> typename std::_Bind_helper<std::__is_socketlike<_Func>::value, _Func, _BoundArgs ...>::type std::bind(_Func&&, _BoundArgs&& ...)
     bind(_Func&& __f, _BoundArgs&&... __args)
     ^
/usr/include/c++/5/functional:1462:5: note:   substitution of deduced template arguments resulted in errors seen above
/usr/include/c++/5/functional:1490:5: note: candidate: template<class _Result, class _Func, class ... _BoundArgs> typename std::_Bindres_helper<_Result, _Func, _BoundArgs>::type std::bind(_Func&&, _BoundArgs&& ...)
     bind(_Func&& __f, _BoundArgs&&... __args)
     ^
/usr/include/c++/5/functional:1490:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
source_file.cpp:26:72: note:   couldn't deduce template parameter ‘_Result’
     std::function<void()> func = std::bind(&AbstractClass::doA, *aClass)
                                                                        ^

我的问题有什么解决办法吗?到目前为止我还没有找到。

您的代码通过值绑定aClass指向的对象。你想通过引用绑定它:

std::function<void()> func = std::bind(&AbstractClass::doA, std::ref(*aClass));

或者直接绑定aClass,指针也可以用于隐式this

std::function<void()> func = std::bind(&AbstractClass::doA, aClass);

[实际示例]

目前最好的建议是支持lambdas而不是std::bind,自从lambdas问世以来,这在标准中被视为某种时代错误。

Lambdas:

  1. 更明确
  2. 效率更高
  3. 不那么令人困惑
  4. 不需要像std::refstd::cref这样的复杂结构

示例:

#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
class AbstractClass {
public:
    AbstractClass() {}
    virtual ~AbstractClass() {}
    virtual void doA() { std::cout << "doA1n"; };
    virtual void doB() = 0;
};
class ImplClass : public AbstractClass {
public:
    ImplClass() {}
    virtual ~ImplClass() {}
    virtual void doA() override { std::cout << "doA2n"; };
    virtual void doB() override { std::cout << "doB2n"; };
};
int main() {
    AbstractClass* aClass = new ImplClass();
    // aClass is a pointer, and a copy of that pointer will be
    // captured. 
    std::function<void()> func = [aClass]{ aClass->doA(); };
    func();
    delete aClass;
    return 0;
}